Woodward after conferring: we don't have a good answer, your Honor. Judge Reyes: I have an answer. The first time the seawall came up in this litigation was on October 16. Now she's reading from a declaration that apparently said the seawall was meant to be repaired in 2011.

Show Post

Judge Reyes is hammering him to ask what the safety hazard is. Woodward keeps refusing to answer. Says the pictures speak for themselves. Woodward then says he doesn't see the point of these questions and JR tells him she gets to decide what questions are relevant. "I'm asking these questions."

Show Post

Judge Reyes is now asking about the claims that the seawall is a safety hazard. What's the hazard? Woodward: we don't want people to fall into the Potomac. JR: that's not what the photos show. How do you know? W: I've golfed there.

Show Post

Woodward: I can ask the White House, but typically that's not how information flows. Judge Reyes: that's why I read you Rule 3.3. Because you are making representations here, and you have a duty of truthfulness.

Show Post

Judge Reyes: at the last hearing you told me there was no contract with golf course designer Mr. Fazio. Woodward: I don't know. We aren't aware of any contract.

Show Post