To quote the Goodwin judgment at §§82-83: > “While it also remains the case that a transsexual cannot acquire all the biological characteristics of the assigned sex …

Show Post

Reliance on the notion of “biological sex” wilfully ignores the judgment in Goodwin v UK, which emphasised that residual *biological* characteristics *cannot* justify the differential *social* treatment of trans people. hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22item...

Show Post

The suggestion that the UK Supreme Court “clarified” anything in their judgment is deeply unserious. The term “biological sex” was arbitrarily introduced by the court, despite it being used nowhere in legislation. (It is a favoured term within “gender critical” rhetoric, however).

Show Post

You wrote: "As you mention, recent developments stem from the Supreme Court’s judgment in April 2025, which clarified that for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010, “sex” refers to biological sex."

Show Post

... taken in the full knowledge that they will severely hurt or even kill individuals. These are being pushed through despite the clear knowledge that they are discriminatory measures that will culpably damage civil relations with a minority group.

Show Post