I think it has improved, overall, but it varies by section. There are now more calls for papers and “new voices panels,” which makes for a better meeting. Other sections still seem to have the same handful of people talking about their favorite issues. The reception has less food now.

Show Post

A paper by @danielschwarcz.bsky.social was cited by @wsj.com in a story about the NAIC which supports state insurance regulators and coordinates oversight. Prof. Schwarcz said this arrangement effectively means than an unelected body holds control over insurance regulation in states. z.umn.edu/bjht

Show Post

There is an excellent idea for much more extensive peer review in law journals, first developed by @danielschwarcz.bsky.social and as I understand still under exploration by him, Scott Hirst, & colleagues. If that sounds worth doing drop Dan a line.

Show Post

@danielschwarcz.bsky.social was quoted by @politico.com about insurance groups backing fossil‑fuel efforts to avoid liability for extreme‑weather damage, a stance the Center for Climate Integrity says shows insurers are ignoring the need to protect policyholders from climate risks. z.umn.edu/bhmu

Show Post

Updated on SSRN with new textual analysis about how AI revision changes student work product. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Show Post