even though I see potential, the work is clearly not embedded in the right context. the lighting is excessively broad, and the complete absence of red sparkle represents a significant shortcoming that the authors fail to acknowledge or justify.

Show Post

Looks like maybe the juniors contributed more than the first author (not a scientist..)

Show Post

The authors should add more holes. How many batches of pumpkins were used to demonstrate reproducibilty? Please provide adequate statistical analysis. In any case, it is suitable to cite [Strub2021], [Strub2024], [Strub2025a] and [Strub2025b] here.

Show Post

While I fully support your inconvenient choice of theoretical model, it remains enigmatic to me why you have not applied magic as a method of data analysis.

Show Post

...Taken together this work lacks even the most basic features of a scientific article. It cannot be published as presented and needs a major overhaul before it can be considered for revision.

Show Post