adrienneleigh.bsky.social
Don’t you see we must either follow one wild possibility or else go home to bed? Also @adrienne@social.treehouse.systems on Mastodon/Fediverse; find me there!
👤 Joined on 26 Mai 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@adrienneleigh.bsky.socialadamsandler.click
ianbremmer.com
6tarian.bsky.social
xjvzmxejgd.bsky.social
aramintas-legacy.bsky.social
paulajohanson.bsky.social
warosintfella.bsky.social
brendaoconnell2.bsky.social
ny911canadianangel.bsky.social
nyakuahyena.bsky.social
skippjon1.bsky.social
2smiggy.bsky.social
trq212-mir-rt2.selfhosted.social
sakher97.bsky.social
gracklehtx.bsky.social
pussyjihad.bsky.social
kastor.sh
mikesblacktowncar.bsky.social
jikukeiseki.bsky.social
sperber.bsky.social
dogsinautumn.bsky.social
lsfinn.bsky.social
teamtalaricohq.bsky.social
kshensation.bsky.social
biarritz45.bsky.social
I hear everything you're saying. But I also think it's fair to say that district court judges have shown grave reluctance to use Rule 11 in situations where they it's warranted (and that greater willingness to impose personal costs on government attorneys might be for the best).
Show PostThis is a run of the mill scenario of an out of control client fucking you, the lawyer. Every other lawyer knows to eat shit and withdraw. Oh, you would lose your job by withdrawing? So would every other lawyer!
Show PostThe other thing is that DOJ in rep of the exec branch for years has behaved as if they are not regular lawyers with the same obligations of all lawyers. They are never doing reasonable investigation of claims, they are never being precise about who their client is.
Show PostYeah hard agree with that. There’s nothing like “wrong” or “improper” with this approach. My point is that it’s atypical, largely because the contumacious conduct here is coming from counsel rather than a party
Show Post